When
I was a sophomore in high school, I was in biology class taking a test and in
the middle of the test I needed a Kleenex.
I
walked up to the front of the class to get one when I heard my teacher ask, “Are
your eyes wandering a bit, Mr. Stecker?”
Implying that I was looking at someone else’s test paper on my way to
get the Kleenex.
Now
I was not looking at anyone else’s paper and I was mortified. Had she said, are you a bit neurotic
about your academic success, Mr. Stecker?
Are you dreamy and unfocused, Mr. Stecker? Even, do you feel nerdy and unworthy from time to time,
Mr. Stecker? I would have been put
off, but ultimately not as offended.
There was some truth to all of those things, certainly when I was a
teenager.
But
to ask if I was cheating? That hurt. I was not, and am not, a cheater.
Her
snarky question sliced right through me not just because I was wrongly accused,
but because I felt fundamentally misunderstood. If she implied that about me, then she didn’t understand me
at all. At 16 you tend to feel
that sort of thing powerfully.
But
it’s not just something you feel as a teenager.
At
the beginning of the New Year, we read the story of Hannah who prayed to God in
despair because she couldn’t have children. Hannah was praying but could not be heard; her lips were
moving but no sound emerged.
Eli,
the Kohen, saw her and thought she was drunk. He said to her, how long will you make a spectacle of
yourself? Stop the drinking!
And
she said to him, “Lo, adoni. No, my Master. I am a very unhappy woman. I have drunk no wine or other strong
drink, but I have been pouring out my heart to God.” (1 Samuel 1:15)
This
summer, in Jerusalem, I studied with numerous scholars at the Hartman Institute
including Professor Tova Hartman, the daughter of the institute's founder, Rabbi David Hartman. Tova
Hartman received her doctorate in education from Professor Carol Gilligan, a
pioneer in gender studies, and has taught and written extensively about
education and gender.
She
asked us to read the story about Hannah as it appears in the Bible and she asked
us learn a passage from the Talmud where the rabbis imagine that Hannah said to
the Kohen not, Lo Adoni. No, my Master, I’m not drunk. But rather, Lo adon atah badavar ze.
You are not the master over this matter, nor does the Divine spirit rest upon you, because you suspected me
wrongly. (Talmud Brachot 31b)
Tova
Hartman went on to say that Hannah was misunderstood by two key men in her life
– Eli the Kohen, who thought she was drunk, and her husband, who said, in effect,
“Why are you so sad? True you don’t
have a child, but you have me, babe.
What more could you possibly want?”
Listening
to Tova Hartman, and reflecting subsequently on her teaching, I began to
consider how much misunderstanding lies behind so many of the challenges that
we face. The Jewish community seems less united than ever, men and women often
seem at odds with each other, families are floundering as always.
And I decided I would use these holidays to make a
plea for more understanding.
I imagine
that most of us have felt misunderstood at some point in our lives. So while I’m speaking, I invite you to
consider a time when you felt you were misunderstood. When you felt that a teacher, or a parent, or a spouse, or a
child, or a supervisor totally mis-read you or who you are or what you stand
for. Didn’t get you at all.
If
we want others to understand us, then first and foremost we need to clarify
what we need. Just moping around
feeling misunderstood is fine for a James Dean movie, but it gets tiresome in
real life.
Moreover,
in order to create an overall atmosphere of understanding, we should consider taking steps to understand others.
Within
communities, within families, across socio-economic lines, across gender lines,
we can do a better job trying to show the kind of understanding that we want
others to show us.
I’ll
start with the Jewish community.
The Jewish community is probably even less unified now than it was
decades ago. We’re getting more
polarized in the United States and in Israel. We seem to understand each other less and less and to be increasingly
satisfied with sound-bytes and generalizations.
Arguments
in Israel over who should be Chief Rabbi, Ultra-Orthodox Jews blowing whistles
and throwing eggs at women gathered for communal prayer at the Kotel, showcase
to the world how much animosity exists between Jews.
Here
in the United States, cooperative ventures between Jews of different ideologies
are getting more and more rare.
Often I hear from members of our congregation about how their families
are being torn apart by disagreements over Jewish belief and practice.
How
many of us have felt that someone else is looking down at us for the way we
choose to believe or practice Judaism?
There
are bright spots, however, that are changing the dynamic and I want to share a
few that might be able to guide us.
When
I was in Israel, Rabbi Dov Lipman, a self-described ultra-Orthodox Jew, came to
speak at the Hartman institute. He
is a Knesset member who belongs to Yesh Atid, a party founded by a secular
Jew. He told us that the party’s
founder, Yair Lapid, brought together all of the leaders of the party to get to
know each other. They talked about
their approaches to Judaism, debated each other and, over time, learned to
understand each other a bit better.
On
the night of the election, Dov Lipman was standing next to a female, secular
party leader watching the results come in. It occurred to him that if they did well, she might naturally
get excited and want to give him a hug, which would be awkward for him since
his practice does not allow for physical contact between men and women. The cameras were broadcasting the scene
all over Israeli TV and a big hug from his female colleague would require a lot
of explaining when he got back to his neighborhood.
Turns
out that the results that came in were very favorable, more than
anticipated. Lipman and his
colleague and others won seats.
The
cameras were rolling, recording the candidates’s reactions just as the results
were announced. Lippman’s colleague was so excited by the news, she turned to him,
held out her hands and then gave herself a hug.
And
they both started laughing. He
said it was the most affectionate non-hug he ever received in his life. She could have said, “it’s really silly
that you don’t touch women.” And
maybe she thinks that, and maybe she doesn’t. Instead, she chose to acknowledge his beliefs, so much so that
she overcame her natural inclination.
Weeks
later, Ruth Calderon, another leader of that party who started a yeshiva for
self-described secular Israelis, gave a talk about the Talmud in the
Knesset. And an ultra-Orthodox
rabbi listened quietly and then respectfully raised his hand to offer his own
input.
Months
later, Dov Lipman, representing this party, led the charge for a government
policy insisting that all ultra-Orthodox schools include appropriate secular
education. This is extremely
important for Israel’s future.
He’s taking a huge beating for this within the ultra-Orthodox community,
but he continues. And he has
become an advocate for greater understanding of different approaches to
Judaism.
Yesh
Atid, the name of the party, means, “There is a Future.”
Ignorance
tends to lead to more ignorance.
Understanding tends to lead to understanding.
Martin Luther King
famously said, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do
that. Hate cannot drive out hate:
only love can do that.”
Way
up north in the US in the state of Maine, an Orthodox rabbi welcomed his Reform
colleague, a woman, to his synagogue when she had yahrtzeit for her
father. He invited her to lead a
portion of the service to honor the memory of her father, not in keeping with
the practice of his congregation or with general Orthodox practice.
When
asked about it later by a colleague, the rabbi said, “I figured, either way,
one of us, she or I, was going to be uncomfortable and I thought – why
shouldn’t it be me?”
Now
some of us may be thinking, “Well, that’s Maine.” What about the Kotel, or right here? I’m not guaranteeing specific outcomes
anywhere, but there is more potential for understanding between people of
different religious practices and beliefs if we talk to each other.
Suppose
you have a discussion with a neighbor, family member or friend in front of your
house or in your kitchen, over a cup of tea, and you talk about your attitudes
and invite the other person to talk?
Don’t
we want our choices to be understood?
Don’t we want our friends and neighbors to respect our choices? Would we rather go on feeling
suspicious, resentful and misunderstood? So perhaps we need to start the
conversation. Or try again if we
already started.
Have
a cup of tea. Ask, how are
you? And suggest, in your own
words, I want to talk to you about my beliefs and my practices and to hear you
talk about yours.
There
are numerous ways that this can go wrong.
But assuming good will and basic humanity, if it goes right, then you
may have increased understanding between neighbors, cousins, whomever, and
that’s how it starts.
And
by the way – as you pour the cup of tea, ask yourself, honestly, how open and
understanding am I in this regard?
After all, are we always so accepting of people who think or observe differently
than we do? Are we always so
open-minded?
Little
steps. One conversation at a
time. A little darkness is
banished by some light.
Let’s
move a little closer now. I want
to talk about families. Families
are often hotbeds of misunderstanding. Brothers and sisters, parents and children, grandparents
and in-laws, we’re constantly surprising each other with things that beg to be
understood but are often misunderstood.
The
Israeli author, Amos Oz, wrote an autobiographical book called A Tale of Love and Darkness. I read it just recently when I was staying
in Jerusalem, not far from the places the author describes, and I highly
recommend it.
At
one point, Oz describes feeling ashamed of his typical adolescent thoughts. “How could my parents know what I was
feeling?” He wonders. “And what did I possibly know about
what they were feeling?”
And
then he writes:
“And
how about the two of them? What
did my father know about her ordeal?
What did my mother understand about his suffering?
A
thousand lightless years separated us.”
Factoring
in an author’s poetic exaggeration, factoring in that there were some
particularly painful elements to Amos Oz’s family dynamic, I nonetheless say
with the experience of 20 years as a rabbi and 48 years as a person that more
families than we might want to admit, and maybe most, and maybe all, have felt
the distance one from the other, the sometimes overwhelming misunderstanding,
that Amos Oz identified feeling about his own family.
Each
family is different, the degree and nature of understanding and
misunderstanding are different and there’s no way that I will be able to paint
a picture that is universal to everyone’s experience.
But
I’ll mention a few dynamics that I’ve observed.
I’ve
observed spouses who orbit one another with little conversation about substance
who gradually grow apart because no matrix of understanding was ever
cultivated.
I’ve
observed parents who maintain their image of what their children should be, or
do, even as they discover that their children are incapable or disinterested in
fulfilling their parents’ expectations.
I’ve
observed children who don’t understand that it sometimes takes parents awhile
to start to understand.
It’s
hard to begin to understand our loved ones, especially when we have to stretch
beyond what’s comfortable or familiar.
A
high school friend of mine was extremely academically gifted – things came very
easily to him. He had little
patience for people who were not as sharp as he was. I lost touch with him and saw
him years later at a reunion where he spent an hour telling me about his son
who has multiple learning challenges.
It’s not easy at all for my friend to understand his son, let alone to
accept him as he is. But he spoke
about his effort to understand and support his son, which was inspiring.
Albert
Einstein said that everyone’s a genius.
But tell a fish it has to climb a tree and it’s going to feel very stupid.
How
often do we push loved ones in unhelpful directions that show little
understanding of who they actually are?
So
here too, I’m making an appeal for small steps.
One
family member making room even just to consider what the other actually wants or
the way the other actually is.
Getting
appropriate academic and emotional support for the way children actually are,
rather than continuing to imagine them the way we’d like them to be.
Hannah’s
spiritual leader rushed to judge and her husband rushed to try to solve, but
that’s not what she needed at that moment. She needed some understanding.
Men
don’t easily understand women and women don’t easily understand men, causing
men at times to dismiss women as moody and women at times to bemoan men as
insensitive. I’m generalizing, but
not without basis, I believe.
Straight
people often don’t easily understand gay people and people who are comfortable
in their gender often don’t easily understand people who are not.
But
there are couples who work hard to understand each other and there are people
who, sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly, sometimes easily, sometimes
painfully, come to understand that their sense of who their friends and loved
ones are, and what they are looking for, needs to be reconsidered.
My
son saw a Facebook posting from a boy he used to play Frisbee with at
camp. Over the past several years,
the boy transitioned from male to female and explained, in the posting, that
for the first time in her life, there is harmony between her body and her mind. My son told me about it,
shrugged his shoulders, and just said, “Wow. I had no idea.” And he started to try to use the feminine
pronoun when talking about his former teammate. I witnessed in him, at that moment, the beginning of an
attempt to consider and understand.
People
who are well have a hard time understanding people who are ill. I recently found out that someone I
knew well in college, but kept in touch with sporadically in recent years, is
going through chemo. I didn’t want
to burden him with a call so I sent him an email telling him how much I enjoyed
hanging out with him in college, how much I’ve always admired him, and that I
hope he handles his treatment with strength and humor. I wrote a few more things and hit
send.
And
then I thought. Did I just ask
this guy to handle chemotherapy with humor? I’ve never been through chemo. What was I thinking?
It was kind of a clunky, tone-deaf thing to write.
So
I apologized and just said I hope he’s OK and he said he was.
People
who were born in this country don’t easily understand the unique challenges of
what it means to come to a new country.
I
just spent a month in Israel and I have a tiny sense of what it’s like to spend
time in a country where the spoken language is not my native tongue and the
customs are different from those I’m used to, a tiny sense of what it might be
like to come to a new country, learn a new language, adjust to a whole
different set of expectations. But
still, it’s hard for me to understand.
People
who can afford to eat don’t easily understand how it might be that a person
doesn’t know where his or her next meal is coming from.
There’s
a lot we don’t easily understand.
The Dalai Lama, a keen observer of contemporary life, once wrote, “Nowadays
we have so much information, but so little understanding.”
So
Hannah calls out to us from eternity and urges us to try to understand. If we don’t understand, if we rush to
judge or to solve, we are masters over nothing. The control we think we have is an illusion and it will
likely crumble. If we do try to understand, we can help create a different vibe
and our influence, individually and collectively, will actually be
greater.
And
you never know. Perhaps the
understanding we show will find its way back to us when we need it. And we will need it. As Rabbi Paul Simon and Cantor Art
Garfunkel sang decades ago, “I don’t know a soul that’s not been battered. Don't have a friend who feels at ease. Don't know a dream that's not been
shattered. Or driven to its knees.”
Every
one of us at some point needs a little extra consideration.
If
darkness separates us, as Amos Oz said of his own family, then only we can let
in the light. 50 years after the
Reverend MLK, Jr. spoke at the March on Washington, let’s remember that only
light banishes darkness, only love banishes hatred and understanding is the energy
that fuels the light and the love.
Not always with perfect success, but if you don’t try, you’ll never
know.
More
often than not, I discover a few things about the “other” person. He wants to
love and be loved, she wants to find adventure and security, he has a bunch of problems to deal with. She wants to do something worthwhile in
life. How incredibly incredible
and un-incredible we are.
I
want to conclude with something I learned this summer which blew my mind. It comes from kabbalah, Jewish mysticism.
I
started in biology class and I’m going to end with reference to a kabbalah
class I took with 27 other rabbis where we built on each other’s
interpretations and, curiously, no one was accused of cheating.
The
Zohar, perhaps the most famous book of Jewish mysticism, begins with the story
of creation.
Bereish hormanuta d’malka. In God’s head, the world began to form.
In
God’s imagination, God made room for the world. At first there was a spark of darkness, then a cluster of
vapor with no color at all, but from the spark and the vapor gushed a spectrum
of colors, and those colors formed into a single point of radiant light.
What
does this mean? To my
understanding, it means that the sun, moon and stars exist because God made
room for them. The lion and the
mosquito exist because God made room for them. We all exist because God made room for each of us. According to this understanding, no one
has more or less right to exist because God made room for everyone in God’s
expansive imagination. Room for
me. Room for you. Room for everyone.
My
friends, at the beginning of the year we celebrate the creation of the
universe. And creation is about
making room.
So
I say, let’s celebrate creation by making room for one another.
How
remarkable it would be if we at Temple Israel could imitate God’s creative
impulse so that the full spectrum that we bring might be unified in single
points of light. That doesn’t mean
that we all become the same. It
means that to the extent that we understand and even harness our differences,
we draw communal strength and a shared sense of purpose.
We
become a single point of light that brings food and clothing to those in
need.
A
single point of light that brings melodies from the full range of our cultural
experience to our sacred sanctuary.
A
single point of light that respects the unique gifts that each child, man and
woman brings to this sacred house.
A
single point of light that fights for justice for every human being within and
beyond this sacred house.
We
turn to God on the Birthday of the world and say with extra meaning what we say
every day, ten b’libenu l’havin ul’haskil. Give us the capacity to
understand.
Help
us make room for one another in our heads and our hearts, just like you did
when the world was created.
I
have a dream that as we take steps to increase our understanding, the brightest
lights and the bravest new worlds will emerge.
Dear
God: A new year is beginning. Give us the capacity to understand and
the experience of being understood.
Originally delivered at Temple Israel of Great Neck, September 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment