Our
family visited in the Kennedy Space Center in Florida this past Monday. It’s a very interesting place, the
sight of rocket and shuttle launches for the last half a century and the
repository of parts of the actual aircraft and detailed pictures and explanations
about space exploration.
It’s
extraordinary in so many ways. For
example, when you consider how rudimentary computer technology was when the
Apollo rocket was launched, it’s especially remarkable that all of the calculations
necessary for a successful launch and landing added up.
We
saw an IMAX movie about the Atlantis shuttle, which was launched on a mission
to repair the Hubble space telescope in May of 2009. As I think I’ve shared, I
have some discomfort with heights such that I would not be considered as, say,
the resident chaplain for a shuttle flight crew.
But
I found it amazing to watch as the crew of the Atlantis left the shuttle and,
while tethered to it, emerged into the weightlessness of space to repair the
telescope, which had, among other things, been photographing the births of
stars on galaxies millions of light years away.
One
of the astronauts on that mission described how he refastened a portion of the
telescope, which required him, suspended in space by a tether, to remove
multiple small screws and then refasten them.
He
said that in order to be successful, he just focused with zen-like precision on
the task at hand.
I
thought about the paradox here, that someone surrounded by the enormous cosmic
grandeur of space would focus on such tiny gestures.
And
it seemed worth a few moments for me to encourage us all to consider the
significance of small gestures in light of realities that can seem
overwhelming right here on earth. In this regard, I want to consider the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt and, in a more contemporary vein, a recent book about the State of Israel by noted journalist, Ari Shavit.
The
Torah portion we read recently presents events on quite a grand scale – the
final three plagues and the beginning of the actual exodus from Egypt. And yet, the essential drama is quite
small-scale. Two men continue to
confront one another as the showdown between Moses and Pharaoh reaches its
conclusion. They are bargaining
about the details of the liberation – do only the men go, as Pharaoh wants, or
the men, women, children and livestock, as Moses advocates?
And
when Pharaoh finally relents and tells Moses - all of you can leave, men, women,
children and livestock, to go worship your God - he adds a personal request. וברכתם גם אותי Uverachtem gam oti. Bless me also.
So
interesting from a geopolitical perspective, and so resonant through the ages,
that the fate of two nations is so affected by the psychological interplay between
two individuals.
Coming
on the heels of their wrangling and jockeying, what did Pharaoh mean when he
asked the Israelites to bless him?
And what did Moses respond?
According
to the Mehilta, an early
midrash on the book of Exodus, Pharaoh was afraid that as a first-born, he
would be killed as part of the 10th plague and therefore, he wanted
Moses and the Israelites to pray on his behalf.
That’s
one possibility. Another is that
he was looking for some overall reassurance despite his defeat. Recall when
Isaac’s son Esau realized that the preferred blessing had been given to his
younger brother, Jacob, and asked his father if he had a blessing left for him.
Is
it possible that Pharaoh, finally realizing that the Israelites were receiving
the ultimate blessings of victory and release, was asking if there's a sort of
consolation blessing for him?
And
what does Moses respond? The Torah
records no verbal response. After
Pharaoh asks for a blessing, the Egyptians hasten the departure of the
Israelites for fear of their lives.
The Israelites then ask the Egyptians for silver and gold objects, which
they are given.
Rabbi
Jack Bloom, also a psychologist, has written that it’s unfortunate that Moses
gave Pharaoh no reassurance, offered no blessing whatsoever. Perhaps in that quiet moment, one
person to another, he could have said something like, “you tormented us. We’re leaving. But ultimately Egypt will be ok.”
It
would have been a small gesture.
But according to Jack Bloom, it might have prevented some heartache in
the future. When cosmic events are
hanging in the balance, it pays to focus on the small gestures.
Over
vacation, I read the much-acclaimed new book about Israel by Ari Shavit called My Promised Land. Shavit writes about the complex, intractable challenges
that Israel faces.
Shavit
structures the book around key events that took place during decisive times in
modern Israel’s history. He begins
with his great-grandfather’s trip to Palestine in 1897 and describes, among
other things, Israel’s conquest of Lydda and Ramla, the draining of the swamps,
the rise of the settlements, the rise and fall of Shas leading Aryeh Deri, the
surge of entertainment clubs in Tel Aviv.
Leon
Wieseltier, in his review, wrote the following about the author:
Nowhere is Shavit a stranger in his own land. The
naturalness of his identity, the ease with which he travels among his own
people, has the paradoxical effect of freeing him for a genuine confrontation
with the contradictions and the crimes he discovers. His straightforward
honesty is itself evidence of the “normalization” to which the founders of
Zionism aspired for the Jews in their homeland; but it nicely confounds their
expectation that normality would bring only contentment. Anxiety, skepticism,
fear and horror are also elements of a normal life.
Shavit is on the left-wing of the Israeli
political spectrum. He is a
columnist for the left-leaning Ha’aretz newspaper who views the West Bank
settlements as a huge impediment to peace and believes that Israeli and
Palestinian narratives are tragically at odds with one another.
Yet he also criticizes the left for widely maintaining
that if only Israel would withdraw from the West Bank, major problems would begin
to be resolved. He writes that
there is a realistic likelihood that the West Bank could become a launching pad
for Iranian backed Hezbollah. He
also agrees with Netanyahu that the threat of a nuclear Iran is real and that
the seriousness of this threat had been underplayed for too long.
Wherever you are in your own political views
regarding Israel, I think you’ll appreciate Shavit’s book and as I considered
my theme for this morning’s sermon, I gained clarity into the reason for its
success.
Shavit is sensitive to the details. He appreciates the significance
of small gestures, positive and negative.
For example, in his chapter on his
great-grandfather’s auspicious visit over 100 years ago, he speculates that his
father probably failed truly to acknowledge the plethora of Arab villages in
then-Palestine as he was given a tour of local Jewish communities.
He writes about what it was like for him and his
contemporaries to serve in Gaza in the IDF reserves as Palestinian teens were
being interrogated – how difficult it was initially for middle-aged Israeli
doctors, lawyers and journalists to witness and participate in this at first,
and how many managed to adjust to it in short order.
And yet, toward the end of this chapter in which
he offers his critique of the occupation of Gaza, he writes, by way of conclusion,
that shortly after Israel pulled out of Gaza, Hamas took over and instituted a
security force more fierce and violent toward fellow Palestinians than the IDF
had been.
The book is deeply frustrating. Shavit does not maintain any one
partisan position exclusively and again and again, he describes the intractable
realities that stem from Israel’s existence as a Jewish state surrounded by hundreds
of millions of Muslims growing increasingly radical and, within its own
borders, containing two peoples with radically different narratives about their
own identities and rights.
And yet, the story is also uplifting, as Shavit
describes the Israeli impulse, not just to survive, but to achieve a semblance
of normalcy.
The small gestures, which include his friendship
with a prominent Palestinian lawyer and the recent baby boom of children to
parents across the ideological spectrum, are the sources of greatest optimism
for Shavit.
We are, to be sure, not negotiating the release
of the ancient Israelites, nor are those of us who live in the US navigating
the complex realities of living in the Jewish state.
And we surely will not likely be asked to repair
a space telescope while dangling in space.
But I invite each of us to consider the larger
contours of our lives – the people who depend on us, the impact of our lives on
the future of our people and our planet – and to ask ourselves, what are the
small gestures? What are the tiny
parts that we need to juggle? What
are the small screws that we may sometime need to apply? What are the blessings that we can
offer when asked, and even when not asked?
From ancient Egypt to modern Israel, to outer
space and then back to Great Neck, we should not underestimate the power of the
small gesture.
Originally delivered at Temple Israel of Great Neck on January 4, 2014
Originally delivered at Temple Israel of Great Neck on January 4, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment