I want to
describe a conversation I had while in Israel this summer. It has to do with how we see one
another.
While our
rabbinic group was involved with its program at the Hartman Institute in
Jerusalem, a group of Christian theologians were simultaneously involved in their own program. As we’ve done for the past several summers, we had a few joint
sessions with the Christian leaders.
For one
session we joined in small groups to discuss the concept of the Jews as the
chosen people.
A rabbinic
colleague and I joined with a Baptist minister from Massachusetts. She spoke to us about the experience of
being African American and serving a largely white congregation for several
years before taking an administrative role in the church.
Ultimately
she shared with us her theological perspective on the Jews as chosen people: While Christians acquired a special
relationship with God through faith in Jesus, Jews had, and continue to have, a
special relationship by virtue of God’s covenant with us which preceded the
Christian covenant.
For me,
there were several powerful and illuminating moments in our time together. Before we started to discuss the topic
at hand, before we heard the above perspective on the Jews as chosen, we
chatted a bit about our work and our families. As we all were speaking about our children’s summer
experiences, the minister mentioned that her son, a middle school student, was
spending the summer at math camp.
My colleague
said she knew a math teacher in the community where the minister lived and
hoped it wasn’t the minister’s son’s teacher, given that he needed to spend the
summer in math camp.
The
minister explained that her son was in math camp so he could get a jump on
calculus in anticipation of high school. She went on to tell us that she’s an engineer by training and
she thinks it’s important for children to achieve as strong a foundation in
math as possible before they get to college.
Let’s just
take a moment to think about that conversation – what was said and what was
assumed. It happened very quickly and it took me awhile to process it. There is nothing shameful about learning math over the summer for remedial
purposes, but that was assumed, not revealed.
The
conversation continued. The
minister described a lecture she heard in which the lecturer described how sad
he was that each successive generation of American Jews was becoming more and
more white. She interpreted that
to mean that he was distressed that the Jews were assimilating more and more
into the wider society.
The minister
said she took exception to that.
She felt the lecturer, though well-meaning and trying to make a point
regarding assimilation, just wasn’t feeling what it might mean for someone to
have no choice regarding “how white to be.”
And then she
shared with us how nervous she gets every time her son, whom she’d spoken about
earlier, goes to the local mall.
She tells him not to wear his hood over his head, a style which many
black and white kids have adopted, because it could cause trouble for him as a
black teen.
Well, by the
time we got to the official topic about the Jews as the chosen people we
already had a lot to think about.
I want to
challenge us to think about how we see, to consider the assumptions we make,
the conclusions we draw, the empathy we have or don’t have, based on what we
see.
Malcolm
Gladwell wrote an entire book called Blink
about how quickly we draw conclusions about people the instant we set eyes on
them.
There’s a
psychology experiment where participants are asked to look at a series of
pictures that flash very quickly on a screen and they have to respond quickly
to indicate their associations, whether positive or negative.
It’s very
revealing, and often people who participate in the experiment are surprised to
discover their prejudices. By
prejudices, I mean the associations that they have just based on seeing.
I want to
analyze a passage from this morning’s Torah reading that I think can shed some
light on what it means to see another human being.
This
morning’s Torah reading deals in part with the pursuit of צדק tzedek, justice.
The
Israelites are told to appoint judges and officers in order to administer
justice. And then, Moses tells the
people, לא תכיר פנים lo takir panim. The New Jewish Publication Society
translates, “you shall not be partial.” Literally the words mean, ״you shall not
recognize faces.״
Elsewhere in
the Torah we see similar phrases, all of them intended to discourage the judge
from favoring one party or another based on appearance.
Interestingly,
the word panim, face, is used in the
Torah to indicate identity. Before
Jacob means Esau, he wrestles with this being, calls the place where he
wrestled פניאל pni’el, the face of God.
When he
finally meets up with Esau, suspecting that Esau might kill him out of revenge,
and instead they embrace and weep, Jacob says, ראיתי פניך כראות פני אלהים raiti panecha kir’ot pnei elohim. To see your face is like seeing the face of God.
In light of
the way the Torah understands panim,
the face as connected, not only with identity, but with the spark of God’s
essence that we bear, perhaps we can understand “don’t be partial; don’t
recognize faces” as follows:
Don’t
pretend that you can recognize someone’s essence just by looking at them. Don’t imagine that the appearance of
another gives you a substantial connection to the other.
Unless and
until you are prepared, like Jacob, to engage, to struggle, to reconsider and
to risk, your recognition will remain superficial.
The potential
for tzedek, for justice, begins with
one person taking the risk to begin to get to know another more deeply. It truly gains momentum when we, like
Jacob, are capable of seeing p’nei
elohim, God’s face, in someone else.
Study after
study has shown that people’s appreciation for diversity in terms of race,
ethnicity, ideology, sexuality and other realms only really improves as they get to know others from all
walks of life beyond the superficial.
Then לא תכיר פנים lo takir panim – the superficial judging
of the face – becomes פני אלהים pnei elohim –
the ability to see the universal behind every face.
It’s a
start, it’s a spark, it happens a little here and a little there, because the
instinct to judge based on superficial appearance is (paradoxically) so deeply
rooted, so instinctive.
But religion,
at its best, is about transcending our instincts. It's also about the transition from תהו ובהו tohu vavohu – the primordial chaos out of which we emerged and
which remains around us and within us – to קדושה kedusha
– the potential to progress and to rise up and raise up.
Why is it
that before we say, קדוש קדוש קדוש kadosh kadosh kadosh
we imitate the angels who turned left and right toward one another – זה אל זה zeh el zeh?
Perhaps
because the march from chaos to kedusha
(holiness) from anarchy to tzedek (justice)
requires us to turn toward one another, to look at one another and to go back again multiple times to look more closely.
We suffer when we do only the most superficial zeh el zeh. We suffer
when we allow ourselves to see one another only in the most superficial ways.
The Torah
invites us to look more closely at each other and it’s not easy.
But when we consider the people we took the time to see more closely, especially
people who look and act differently than we do, we tend to be very grateful for
having done so.
Once we
discover the face of God in another person, it’s hard to go back to the other kind of seeing.
Originally delivered at Temple Israel of Great Neck on August 22, 2015
Originally delivered at Temple Israel of Great Neck on August 22, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment